On the evening of Friday, June 12, 2026, the SPVM chief called an emergency news conference to announce that an entire team of Montreal North patrol officers had been dismantled. Two officers suspended, the file referred to the DPCP, fourteen others reassigned. Beyond the shock, one question remains: bad apples, or a rotten barrel?
I — The facts
What happened at Station 39
It was around 9 p.m. on Friday, June 12, when senior officials of the Service de police de la Ville de Montréal (SPVM) arrived at neighbourhood Station 39, in Montreal North, to relieve an entire night patrol team of duty until further notice. A few hours later, Chief Fady Dagher called an emergency news conference to announce what he himself described as an unprecedented event: the complete dismantling of a police shift suspected of racist conduct.
According to reports by La Presse and Radio-Canada, members of the team allegedly targeted Black people and people of Arab descent abusively during stops, and made disparaging, racially tinged remarks. The hardest detail to stomach: officers allegedly cut the hair of men they had apprehended and kept it, like war trophies. Chief Dagher confirmed that these acts are « part of the allegations. » All the officers involved have had their service weapons removed.
II — The numbers
How many officers, exactly?
Media coverage has circulated several figures — 2, 14, 16, « about fifteen » — to the point of sowing confusion. Yet they all describe the same group.
| 2 suspended | Their file is in the hands of the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions (DPCP), who is weighing possible criminal charges. |
| 14 reassigned | To duties with no public contact, or relocated elsewhere across the territory. |
| 16 in total | The figure used by Radio-Canada and CBC, adding up all the officers involved. |
| « About fifteen » | La Presse‘s wording, including those who allegedly took part in the acts or tolerated them. |
For now, the file referred to the DPCP concerns a single incident, but the SPVM has stated that checks into other episodes are under way. Most of the officers involved are young men with, on average, three or four years of service — fewer than five, according to Radio-Canada; two women are among the group.
III — The origin
A complaint from within
The most striking feature of this affair lies in its origin. Neither citizen complaints nor a viral video triggered the intervention: it was other officers at Station 39 who reported their colleagues on the night shift. The investigation began in March, based on internal information. It was on Thursday at noon, however, that the SPVM gathered enough evidence to refer the matter to the DPCP and, the following evening, to proceed with the dismantling.
The Deputy Premier and Minister of Public Security, Ian Lafrenière, stressed one point: what « reassures » him is that the complaint came from within police ranks themselves. An optimistic reading — one our contributor, for his part, urges caution about.
« I was extremely surprised. I didn’t think it was possible in 2026. »
The chief, who has made the fight against racial profiling his signature since taking office in 2022, does not hide the ordeal ahead. He anticipates a difficult period and heightened public mistrust, and warns: this is probably not the end — more cases could follow.
IV — The context
The weight of Montreal North
Station 39 is no ordinary station. It covers the area where, in 2008, 18-year-old Fredy Villanueva was killed during a police intervention that escalated, triggering riots and a public coroner’s inquest. The death of Jean-Pierre Bony in 2016 revived those tensions in the same borough. For nearly two decades, the SPVM has multiplied community-outreach initiatives there. It is precisely in this neighbourhood — one of the most multi-ethnic in the metropolis — that the current allegations surface, barely three months after Mr. Dagher unveiled his five-year plan against systemic racism.
But the unease extends well beyond Station 39 alone. In March 2025, the death of 29-year-old Abisay Cruz during a police intervention in the Saint-Michel neighbourhood sparked several protests against police brutality. It is this continuum — from one end of Montreal to the other — that our contributor Alain Babineau places at the heart of his reading of events.
Politically, the response converged within hours on a single tool: Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada and Minister Lafrenière announced their intention to speed up the rollout of body cameras at the SPVM, a file opened and then shelved since the 2016–2017 pilot project. This is where Alain Babineau comes in — a jurist, former RCMP staff sergeant, and director of racial profiling and public safety at the Red Coalition — who has been calling for this measure, and much more, for years.
« You can’t clean up a rotten barrel by removing sixteen apples. »
For Babineau, the Station 39 affair is not an anomaly but a symptom: the culmination of forty years of documented institutional racism at the SPVM, from the 1965 Springate survey to the Service’s own data, by way of repeated warnings from its own Black officers. He credits Chief Dagher’s move — unprecedented, in his view — while refusing to see it as reform. His argument, too dense to fit in this article, is the subject of a separate op-ed we are publishing alongside, which you can also download in full below.
V — The law
What the law says — and what remains to be decided
Mr. Babineau’s argument rests on a real legal foundation, which is worth clarifying for the reader — because the file is not closed, and a nuance is in order regarding the basis of the ruling he cites.
Systemic discrimination. The right to equality without discrimination is protected by section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and by sections 10 and 12 of Quebec’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.
The Luamba case (random traffic stops). In Procureur général du Québec v. Luamba, 2024 QCCA 1387, the Court of Appeal upheld the Superior Court ruling (2022 QCCS 3866) declaring section 636 of the Highway Safety Code — which authorized stops without grounds — to be of no force or effect. The Court found that the practice leads to racial profiling.
On the legal basis. The Court of Appeal grounded its conclusion in sections 9 (arbitrary detention) and 15 (equality) of the Canadian Charter — not the Quebec Charter. This is also the basis correctly cited in Alain Babineau’s op-ed published alongside.
Current as of June 14, 2026. The Government of Quebec took the matter to the Supreme Court of Canada, which heard arguments in January 2026. The decision is under reserve. The ban on random stops is therefore not definitively settled: the country’s highest court could uphold, qualify, or overturn the Court of Appeal’s ruling.
VI — The debate
Bad apples or a rotten barrel?
This is the fault line running through the whole affair. On one side, authorities who see the internal complaint as proof that the safeguards finally worked: « what reassures me is that it was police officers themselves who reported these acts, » said Minister Lafrenière. On the other, voices like Mr. Babineau’s, for whom a belated detection, triggered internally, cannot stand in for structural reform.
Between the two, the facts: a criminal investigation under way, two officers suspended, a community that has been demanding accountability since 2008, and a racial-profiling case awaiting its outcome in Ottawa. Friday evening’s news conference did not settle the debate. It brought it back to the front page.
EnDroit.ca · The law, closer to citizens
Also read — Alain Babineau’s op-eds
Editorial note. This article reports on an ongoing matter and offers an in-depth analysis. It does not constitute legal advice and is no substitute for consulting a lawyer in good standing with the Barreau du Québec. The conduct described remains, at this stage, allegations: no charges have been laid and the presumption of innocence fully applies to the officers concerned.
Alain Babineau’s op-ed, cited and summarized here, is published in full as a separate text (and offered for download); it expresses his personal opinion, reproduced with his permission. The clarification regarding the constitutional basis of the Luamba ruling (sections 9 and 15 of the Canadian Charter) is provided by the editors. The case on random traffic stops is under reserve at the Supreme Court of Canada at the time of publication. EnDroit.ca (formerly Justice-Quebec.ca) is an independent citizen platform for legal journalism. The author is not a lawyer.
Main sources
Reports of June 12, 2026 — La Presse, « Une équipe de policiers démantelée par le SPVM » and the column « Bombe à Montréal-Nord ». Radio-Canada, CBC News, Le Devoir. The Canadian Press (Coralie Laplante), a dispatch picked up by several regional dailies.
Legal references — Procureur général du Québec v. Luamba, 2024 QCCA 1387, upholding 2022 QCCS 3866; appeal heard by the Supreme Court of Canada in January 2026. On the death of Abisay Cruz (Saint-Michel, March 2025), Radio-Canada and La Presse, April 2025.
Contribution — Alain Babineau, op-ed published on EnDroit.ca on June 14, 2026, reproduced with his permission.
En savoir plus sur EnDroit.ca
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

